3 ms·
Looking at the number of pull requests for any given project I guess is a very good indicator. Looking at the number of closed jQuery pull requests yields a pre
by DigitalSea 14y ago
Looking at the number of pull requests for any given project I guess is a very good indicator. Looking at the number of closed jQuery pull requests yields a pretty high number: https://github.com/jquery/jquery/pulls?direction=desc&page=1&sort=created&state=closed https://github.com/jquery/jquery/pulls?direction=desc&pa... — there's no doubt in my mind that putting Bootstrap on Github is the reason it succeeded as well (look at the number of pull requests, forks and issues raised. Looking at Rails you can see there have been thousands of successfully merged pull requests: https://github.com/rails/rails/pulls?direction=desc&page=1&sort=created&state=closed https://github.com/rails/rails/pulls?direction=desc&page... — would that number of bugs and features have been addressed if it weren't on Github? I could go on with lists of more high activity repositories, but I think it's more than obvious Github has been a blessing to a lot of open source projects and undoubtedly helped them become more successful and stable (how much is a somewhat subjective and un-measurable thing).
- InclinedPlane 14y agoAlso look at the other side of the equation, acquisition and installation. How many OSS projects have "git clone <git-hub-repo>" as the first step of their install instructions these days?