I stand by my comment. I see no clear difference in meaning between your wording and my rewording. > "Github mainly succeeded because of the various shortcomin

I stand by my comment. I see no clear difference in meaning between your wording and my rewording. > "Github mainly succeeded because of the various shortcomings in Gits command line interface." The success of github has nothing to do with shortcomings in git's CLI. As you say, for some people, the command line is for beards. So for them any CLI is a non-starter; nothing to do with shortcomings with git's CLI. The power available to a command line user of git is one of the reasons github is such a good thing.