5 ms·
Here's some more real world testing, done by the folks at Zimbra: http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/OpenLDAP_MDB_vs_HDB_performance http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/OpenL
by hyc_symas 14y ago
Here's some more real world testing, done by the folks at Zimbra:
http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/OpenLDAP_MDB_vs_HDB_performance http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/OpenLDAP_MDB_vs_HDB_performance
Clearly more than 4x write speed improvement.
- jules 14y agoNice! Do you know why that benchmark show almost no read improvement but massive write improvement? The slides here (http://symas.com/mdb/20120322-UKUUG-MDB.pdf http://symas.com/mdb/20120322-UKUUG-MDB.pdf) suggest the opposite? Or am I reading them incorrectly?
- hyc_symas 14y agoAs I understand it, that test used something like 32 server threads on a machine with only 4 cores. The UKUUG prezo used 16 server threads on a machine with 16 cores, which allowed all of the reads to run concurrently. The smaller number of CPU cores in the Zimbra test naturally reduces the concurrency advantage of LMDB.