4 ms·
I heard through the grapevine that no one wanted to fund Optimizely the first time they pitched for a series A because VCs pigeonholed A/B testing as a crowded
by pixelmonkey 13y ago
I heard through the grapevine that no one wanted to fund Optimizely the first time they pitched for a series A because VCs pigeonholed A/B testing as a crowded space with too small a market. So then, Optimizely went out and executed like crazy, is now making millions per year, and was able to basically define whatever terms they wanted for their fundraising round.
This story, if true, would explain why it's such a massive round: it's payback for the annoyance of having to pitch a second time around.
Anyway, that's all hearsay. The team deserves nothing but praise -- I hear love for their products regularly from my customers (my startup is next-gen content analytics provider for large sites).
- jacquesm 13y ago> it's payback for the annoyance of having to pitch a second time around. I really don't see how you would make 'payback' work. If you can do a better round you should do a better round, payback doesn't enter into it. Everybody involved thought this was a good deal otherwise there would be no deal. You can't get a (sane) investor to pay a premium over and beyond what they feel the company is worth.