3 ms·
Surely that's like saying we've had nuclear submarines since Jules Verne wrote "20,000 leagues under the sea" insofar as Project Orion was little more than scie
by podperson 14y ago
Surely that's like saying we've had nuclear submarines since Jules Verne wrote "20,000 leagues under the sea" insofar as Project Orion was little more than science fiction and didn't involve fusion drives ("atomic bomba" would be fission).
(Verne's Nautilus was powered by primitive batteries.)
- mchouza 14y agoProject Orion was much more than science fiction (http://www.scribd.com/doc/28668567/Nuclear-Pulse-Space-Vehicle-Study http://www.scribd.com/doc/28668567/Nuclear-Pulse-Space-Vehic...) though it was much less than operational. Very big Orion spaceships would have used fusion explosions (http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/321.jvn.fall02/Dyson.pdf http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/321.jvn.fall02/Dyso...), but not the relatively small ones that were subjected to detailed analysis.
- podperson 14y agoYou say "conceptual design" and I say little more than science fiction. Potato, potato -- some kind of solid fuel rocket is going to lift a shield strong enough to protect a crew with 90 days of "emergency" supplies from small stomic bombs going off... Right. And this is for a lunar mission! There's more detailed stuff out on the warp drive NASA has funded study on, meanwhile the grandparent made it sound like someone had built one of these things (only with fusion bombs) in 1952 and it was rusting in a shed somewhere.