HN won't let my reply to you both individually any time soon it seems so I'll do so here. The paper was submitted as part of a book, yes. http://www.nottingham

HN won't let my reply to you both individually any time soon it seems so I'll do so here. The paper was submitted as part of a book, yes. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/ncmh/BGER/volume-21.html http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/ncmh/BGER/volume-21.html As for the actual individuals who did the peer-review you'll have to ask William Freese and David Schubert. The university only mentions that the papers were reviewed. You could perform this on me if you wish, I don't really care... https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy Even if I did call these guys up and inquire about the reviewers you'd no doubt move the goal posts and say "well those reviewers aren't accredited and don't have much experience yada yada..." In any case the past record for Monsanto isn't a glowing one (Agent Orange, DDT) and there is no reason to assume it cares to change its ways any time soon. I feel confident I'm on the right side of history.