3 ms·
Basically, yes. Some combination of Walmart, Target, Costco, and Amazon (and I'm sure others that I'm leaving out) have basically taken over the inexpensive dep
by jowiar 14y ago
Basically, yes. Some combination of Walmart, Target, Costco, and Amazon (and I'm sure others that I'm leaving out) have basically taken over the inexpensive department store market, where price is the #1 purchase-decision factor. At some point, you end up in a logistics competition, where your margin is dependent on whether your supply chain is cheaper than someone else's. Within tech, the demise of Dell illustrates the perils of being a commodity supplier.
There's plenty of profit to be had in the higher end, selling "the experience". Nordstrom, for instance, is doing just fine. Being able to walk into a store, talk with knowledgable salespeople who can get a feel for your style and desires, then recommend products that suit them is a value that some customers are willing to pay for.
Johnson's background with Apple was in creating the latter sort of experience, but it simply did not match with the priorities of the JCP customer, and was driven by the notion of "build a better store, and the customers will come", without enough research into where potential gains and losses were.
- cmccabe 14y agoDell isn't dead. They took a hit in recent years, but so did pretty much all PC suppliers. The market is just not growing at the same rate it used to, at least in the US. There's nothing wrong with getting into a logistics competition. You just have to win. Personally, I do not buy any clothes at all from "luxury" stores like Nordstrom's. I buy some clothes online, and basic clothes like socks from Target. I just don't enjoy feeling like a rat in a maze, which I inevitably do at clothing stores. And I don't want salespeople bothering me. The value of all this stuff is pennies in China, so I feel like we are really getting overcharged in many cases.