3 ms·
I think it's because the Sun Times paid the costs of running the site, but I'm not 100% sure.
by ju2tin 13y ago
I think it's because the Sun Times paid the costs of running the site, but I'm not 100% sure.
- officemonkey 13y agoThat's correct, according to Jim Emerson (http://www.rogerebert.com/scanners/remembering-the-roger-i-knew http://www.rogerebert.com/scanners/remembering-the-roger-i-k...) "At first our site also had the support of the Sun-Times, including Catherine Lanucha, John Cary, Jack Barry and the company's webstaff, but budget cuts and layoffs at the paper eventually left us with no day-to-day resources but ourselves: the only two employees of RogerEbert.com, as we liked to joke."