3 ms·
Can you point us to your popular time-saving framework that does all of this the correct way then? Yes I'm purposely being snarky here because while I can acce
by sbarre 14y ago
Can you point us to your popular time-saving framework that does all of this the correct way then?
Yes I'm purposely being snarky here because while I can accept that your are allowed to not like the choices the Bootstrap designers made, this kind of attitude doesn't help.
Bootstrap provides a ton of other valuable benefits to a web project's lifecycle, apart from catering to the one-man pedantic HTML developer who doesn't care about everyone else's jobs (IA, design, prototyping, etc) and dismisses the whole thing because it doesn't cater to his/her views.
Calling a project garbage and dismissing it in this manner is just short-sighted and, well, selfish. If Bootstrap's code was really that bad, wouldn't it be less popular? Wouldn't someone have produced a better competing product?
- oblique63 14y agoIt's popular because it's pretty, not because its code is nice. If you're genuinely interested in a framework that is actually sanely implemented (IMO), check out Foundation: http://foundation.zurb.com/ http://foundation.zurb.com/ It's unfortunate that it's not more popular, since it was the framework that actually inspired Bootstrap, but I can see why people think bootstrap is 'prettier'...
- beatpanda 14y agoThere are many better products than Bootstrap. I don't know why they aren't more popular. I guess the real problem is that craftsmanship is out of style. Using Bootstrap is what is short sighted, because following its recommended implementation will create problems down the road, not just for me, the pedant, but the whole team.
- pc86 14y agoFrom the parent: > Can you point us to your popular time-saving framework that does all of this the correct way then? So please suggest something. I'm curious to see what product (perhaps that you've worked on?) solves all of Bootstrap's obvious shortcomings.