3 ms·
> It's a collaborative text editor. What point is there to using it offline? You're using your premise as your argument. > All the disadvantages you state are
by lutusp 14y ago
> It's a collaborative text editor. What point is there to using it offline?
You're using your premise as your argument.
> All the disadvantages you state are already inherent in the concept of "collaborative text editor", whether or not it's web-based.
Not at all. A locally hosted application can collaborate by sharing only its data, not the application itself, with all data stored locally after the work session ends. I'm only making the point that your premise is mistaken, not that a collaborative editor isn't an obvious application for Web technologies, all legitimate objections aside.
The good news is that a collaborative editor might itself be Web-based, and its documents might reside in the cloud for obvious practical reasons. That's also the bad news, due to problems already listed.
- derefr 14y agoI'm not sure if you've been keeping up with what "web-based" means, but given HTML5 cache manifests and storage APIs (localStorage, IndexedDB, etc.), web applications are perfectly capable of "sharing only its data, not the application itself, with all data stored locally after the work session ends." You can basically think of a web application, these days, as a native app that just happens to "update" to the newest server-provided version whenever you start it up, if you're online at the time.