4 ms·
The comment about the last 20 years also makes me twitch a bit. That sort of thing always makes me wonder if it's supposed to be about the state of actual usabl
by kd0amg 14y ago
The comment about the last 20 years also makes me twitch a bit. That sort of thing always makes me wonder if it's supposed to be about the state of actual usable programming languages or of recent PL research. Either way, the first two things I think of when asked about recent advances are substructural types (maybe stretching the 20-year limit) and higher-order contracts, and these are both available in things intended as general-purpose languages (Rust and Racket).
- jes5199 14y agoYeah, it's almost like he's making a definition that's impossible to satisfy: the changes in mainstream languages (since 1993!) don't count because the features already existed in academic languages, but the new features in academic languages don't count because they aren't mainstream.