3 ms·

Why don't you just post the link to Go 1.1 beta 1 vs Java/JVM rather than speculating? http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=

• igouy 14y ago
  Please check which Go version was used for the measurements `trailfox` pointed to ;-)
  • trailfox 14y ago
    Good point. It turns out that the quad core benchmarks on 32bit which I linked to are already using Go 1.1beta, so any speed gains for Go 1.1 are already factored in: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=go&lang2=java http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u32q/benchmark.php?t... The 64 bit quad core benchmark is using go 1.0.3: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=go&lang2=java http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?t...
    • voidlogic 14y ago
      Go does has known issues and does poorly on 32-bit x86. I would not draw any meaningful conclusions from it about Go in general.
      • igouy 14y ago
        Would you draw meaningful conclusions from the x64 measurements in-general -- knowing that they don't hold for x86 ;-)
        • voidlogic 14y ago
          I do see your point, but the vast majority of Go production code runs on Linux/amd64, so yes, that is the most meaningful result.