I am disappointed by this article coming from ARS, a site I have huge respect for. The article ignores parts of conversation and chooses the ones which suits i

I am disappointed by this article coming from ARS, a site I have huge respect for. The article ignores parts of conversation and chooses the ones which suits its narrative. Developers were concerned about leaving unmaintained code left in the tree, which was previously only used by chrome. If you follow the thread devs were more than happy to keep it as long as someone maintained it. And finally that's what happened. Either way discussions like these are common in Open source project , any project as a matter of fact, but to spin it like this is simply manufacturing a story for page views.