No. Since he's advocating chucking morality out the window, I can only assume he had something special and immoral planned (which largely went unexplicitly sta

No. Since he's advocating chucking morality out the window, I can only assume he had something special and immoral planned (which largely went unexplicitly stated). The most efficient isn't to spread a limited wealth over a large number of people, but to reduce the number of people with little wealth. After all, since we've thrown out the concept of society as a means to protect principles of justice for individuals, we can surely afford to sacrifice some individuals for those lucky enough to be left in the selected set. But you're right, he was probably only suggesting theft.