4 ms·
Nope. It would require less farming to feed people than to feed animals and people to eat those animals. Energy loss is an order of magnitude. If you ate the pl
by btipling 14y ago
Nope. It would require less farming to feed people than to feed animals and people to eat those animals. Energy loss is an order of magnitude. If you ate the plants instead of eating the animals eating the plants it would be more energy efficient.
- Ygg2 14y agoWould it take less energy to grow meat (in lab) or grow plant?
- btipling 14y agoI don't know anything about growing meat in the lab, but it doesn't sound very appealing and I've lost any desire to eat meat long ago so I don't really care either way. The theoretical potential to grow meat isn't in any way a convincing argument to make eating meat right this minute either non-cruel or energy efficient however.