4 ms·
I'm not sure how to interpret your argument. It just seems like your pissed of someone else has 2,000,000 dollars.
by ramblerman 14y ago
I'm not sure how to interpret your argument. It just seems like your pissed of someone else has 2,000,000 dollars.
- myspace 14y agoWhat pisses me off is people are falling into this Ponzi Scheme.
- mkr-hn 14y agoHow is it a Ponzi scheme? I don't see anyone promising returns to previous investors based on money taken from new investors.
- dustyleary 14y agoIt's a bit of a stretch to call it a Ponzi scheme IMO, but you could try to make the argument that all the early investors who got in for cheap/"free" are now cashing out with the money of new investors. But, the "Ponzi scheme" people are essentially engaging in name calling, because its definitely not a Ponzi scheme. There is no Ponzi (or Madoff) at the top running the scheme. Better to rationally call it what it is: an enormous ramp in the spot price driven almost purely by speculation. Some people say it's a classic bubble. Bitcoin already had one of these in 2011, this could be another. Some people say bitcoin is different than other commodities, that this is not a bubble, but more of a "tipping point" event where bitcoin has gained enough traction/attention that it is rocketing up to its "true" value. Pick your side, and if you're so inclined, place your bets.
- brc 14y agoIt's their lookout - if it does collapse, it's small enough that it won't cause real harm. If it doesn't, then it's a pretty exciting new development in the world of currency and money. People trading Bitcoins and working on it are doing no harm to anyone, so I find it odd that anyone could get upset about it. It's like getting upset about people who trade dolls or toy soldiers or rare oil cans.