My point was that your argument was naive, since you did an analogy between individuals in rule-of-law societies and countries. I pointed out that there is a mu

My point was that your argument was naive, since you did an analogy between individuals in rule-of-law societies and countries. I pointed out that there is a much better analogy. You have nothing to say about my point, except demanding that I should explain a single example of cooperation? And about your example: Can you first show that the cooperation isn't in the economical or political interest of the countries? (That would make it realpolitik -- in this case, it is good to be nice.) Or at least for large lobbyist groups? Or the personal interest of the ruling politicians? If you can show that, you have a counter example. [To an argument about statistical behaviour...]