5 ms·
Wait, was this necessarily without their knowledge? It seems like the proposed legislation targets people who get jobs under the guise of normal employment but
by nkozyra 14y ago
Wait, was this necessarily without their knowledge? It seems like the proposed legislation targets people who get jobs under the guise of normal employment but are really there to film.
This takes away the "trespassing" thing that's getting bandied about ... there are certainly whistleblower protections for regular employees, are those out the window?
- pyre 14y agoHow is this any different from other investigative journalism? Why is "getting film of what happens behind closed doors" need to be called "terrorism?"
- goostavos 14y agoPerhaps I'm just cynical, but I would assume to make it less pleasurable to vote against. It's not tough to imagine a blurb come election cycle along the lines of "Senator X voted against anti-terrorism bills designed to keep us safe! Senator Y strongly cares about your safety, and the safety of the Nation. Vote Y. Vote America."
- trhtrsh 14y agoRight, and that's why this lawmaking behavior is so wrong.