> This is really just an extension of clickjacking That's was my first thought too, but in fact, it's quite the reverse of clickjacking (even though the same b

> This is really just an extension of clickjacking That's was my first thought too, but in fact, it's quite the reverse of clickjacking (even though the same basic idea is used). With clickjacking, you would positionate some opacity:0 link on top of some apparently legit link. Here, on the contrary, the malicious content is within the apparently legit content, then moved away with css (setting opacity to 0 would not do the trick). Not a big difference, but that would deserve a dedicated name, IMO.