4 ms·
If you ignore IE+Windows XP, you can safely use SNI.
by theatrus2 14y ago
If you ignore IE+Windows XP, you can safely use SNI.
- micro-ram 14y agoI would love to...Who's with me? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
- cdjk 14y agoAlas, while I feel comfortable not XB testing WinXP because it's less than 1% of users (or whatever threshold you want), I'm not quite as comfortable using that argument with SSL certs. Unfortunately the two solutions (SNI and IPv6) are unlikely to work on XP, so the only hope is to wait until all those computers are replaced or upgraded.
- kelnos 14y ago... and the stock Android browser, IIRC.
- dkulchenko 14y agoFixed since 3.x: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=12908#c13 https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=12908#c13
- fpgeek 14y agoTrue, but just like XP, there are lots of pre-3.x devices out there...
- giovannibajo1 14y agoThat would be approximately 50% of them, btw.
- pilif 14y agoIt's any browser on XP which uses the Windows Crypto API, most notably probably the second most used browser, Chrome. As long as XP is around, we're going to need One IP address per domain if we want to do SSL.
- pmh 14y agoChrome 6+ appears to support SNI on XP [1] https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=43142 https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=43142 [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Browsers_with_support_for_TLS_server_name_indication.5B6.5D http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Browsers...