3 ms·
What you've got is more of an argument against inefficient or wasteful means of enforcement than the concept as a whole. Compare: "The practical ease with whic
by GHFigs 14y ago
What you've got is more of an argument against inefficient or wasteful means of enforcement than the concept as a whole.
Compare: "The practical ease with which privacy may be violated is in itself an argument against its rigid enforcement."
- sethrin 14y agoAbsolutely. In a similar sense,we recognize that privacy is a right which is not enforceable in public, or for celebrities. It's possible that an expectation of privacy on the Internet is also unreasonable. You're not making the point you think you are. Show that copyright may be effectively policed.