>I think what set Ebert apart is that he consistently judged films in the context of their ambitions Yet he consistently dismissed films that I would describe

>I think what set Ebert apart is that he consistently judged films in the context of their ambitions Yet he consistently dismissed films that I would describe as "low brow humour" as being terrible films. He said Ace Ventura was one of the worst films he had seen for example, and his reasoning appeared to be "the character is annoying, and the jokes are crude".