3 ms·
yes. using "python3" to run Python 3 would have been possible without breaking existing scripts. Also you can switch your entire infrastrucutre to use "python
by bambambazooka 14y ago
yes. using "python3" to run Python 3 would have been possible without breaking existing scripts. Also you can switch your entire infrastrucutre to use "python3" without breaking anything. I don't say switching to Python 3 was to early or the worst thing in the world. I'm just not sure if changing the "python" symlink to "python3" was great.