I'm not sure why this article has you so upset with the NYT. It's not some morality play, it's about a paper published in Science magazine, one of many papers p

I'm not sure why this article has you so upset with the NYT. It's not some morality play, it's about a paper published in Science magazine, one of many papers published every year that track changes to the environment. The fact that a different NYT writer (not a science reporter but a columnist) got his facts muddled when speaking extemporaneously, seems like a convenient straw man.