perhaps the only insightful comment from the entire rant is that "males are general, females are particular." an exploration into why this seems to be upheld i

perhaps the only insightful comment from the entire rant is that "males are general, females are particular." an exploration into why this seems to be upheld in the minds of most people would be way more interesting than her rant that Pixar must be sexist for thinking the same way as the rest of the human race. Pixar is a company that tells identifiable human stories mostly with non-human living creatures and animated inanimate objects. Giving them "generic human" properties in order to appeal to the general human condition just seem like common sense. In fact, I am way more disturbed by the fact that most male characters in recent stories are portrayed as weak, flawed and/or immoral, and that most female characters are the embodiment of kindness, good sense and smarts. There may be more male characters, but are any of them adequate role models for our male youth?