You can state that something has been taken too far without the expectation that that sentiment will change anything. Those are two separate issues. I think it

You can state that something has been taken too far without the expectation that that sentiment will change anything. Those are two separate issues. I think it is perfectly reasonable to say that the risk/reward ratio here is quite a bit different than many of Anon's previous targets. As much as we deride North Korea's military ability, they still have the potential to inflict a great deal of harm to a large number of people. That risk hasn't really been present to this level in many of the things Anon has been involved in before as far as I know.