4 ms·
I don't care whether you think I was being too specific in my choice of location. If you have read it, the article was about a US government agency. Sure, ther
by lhnz 14y ago
I don't care whether you think I was being too specific in my choice of location. If you have read it, the article was about a US government agency.
Sure, there are real life conspiracies, but understand this, just because we can define a conspiracy as 'the very thing secret agencies do' does not prove that the DAE is conspiring to release PR articles to spread disinformation.
There's no evidence of what the OP suggested but there is a whole lot of paranoia and emotions running wild and it doesn't befit this place.
- pedrocr 14y agoOh, you were serious about your initial comment. I wasn't asserting that the this was a DEA plant, or assuming any conspiracy. If I had to guess I'd say the DEA is indeed flustered by iMessage. My point, made jokingly, is that it's hard to tell between "real reporting of the DEA being flustered" from "planted reporting to get criminals to use iMessage and get busted". Hopefully encouraging critical inquiry of news sources befits this place.