4 ms·
I tend to believe everything except the performance part. I'd be curious to see a less interested party doing the analysis. I'd like to get Carmack's or Sween
by kenjackson 14y ago
I tend to believe everything except the performance part.
I'd be curious to see a less interested party doing the analysis. I'd like to get Carmack's or Sweeney's take on this. This feels like MS claiming that IE gets better perf than Chrome.
- Ziomislaw 14y agoactually, IE has comparable performance to Chrome (at least in webGL), but they tuned it by silently dropping frames. ;p so yes, Im pretty sure M$ technologies are written really well and could not be trivially optimized by as much as 20%. :)
- arasmussen 14y agoI thought IE doesn't support WebGL?
- spoiler 14y agoI think 10 and 9 do
- esrauch 14y agoNo released IE supports it, but IE11 might. Microsoft hasn't announced anything explicit.
- b0b_d0e 14y agoAt least according to this blog post, there is hints that IE 11 might have some form of OpenGL support in it http://withinwindows.com/within-windows/2013/3/30/blues-clues-how-to-enable-webgl-in-internet-explorer-11 http://withinwindows.com/within-windows/2013/3/30/blues-clue...
- dmm 14y ago> I tend to believe everything except the performance part. My recollection is that the performance increase came from a flaw in the renderer that was accidentally fixed in the OpenGL port.