4 ms·
I don't think there is a reason. GUD is very powerful and integrates well within Emacs. cgdb rather seems to be designed for vi users who don't want a debug i
by fafner 14y ago
I don't think there is a reason. GUD is very powerful and integrates well within Emacs. cgdb rather seems to be designed for vi users who don't want a debug interface in their editor.
- bnegreve 14y agoI agree with this, gud is at least as good as cgdb.