3 ms·
That is not peer-reviewed research, and therefore I treat it about as seriously as I treat any other comment on the internet: at best incompetent, at worst mali
by polyfractal 14y ago
That is not peer-reviewed research, and therefore I treat it about as seriously as I treat any other comment on the internet: at best incompetent, at worst maliciously deceiving. Considering its published by a company that makes money from freezing people...probably the latter.
- lsparrish 14y agoBy all means, please, show us peer reviewed sources that contradict it.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- davidgerard 14y agoIt so, so doesn't work like that. You don't get to make a spurious claim and then defy anyone who objects to find evidence it's false. You personally were told this in excruciating detail on http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Cryonics http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Cryonics . Cryonicists really just don't get burden of proof.