3 ms·
That's not what it's about. In the case of Billy Bragg, it is he who's trying to control Google's content. In the case of that Guardian piece, there's a funda
by danhak 18y ago
That's not what it's about. In the case of Billy Bragg, it is he who's trying to control Google's content. In the case of that Guardian piece, there's a fundamental lack of understanding about Google's role. Google is the lifeblood of content providers. If you write an article and nobody can find it, does it really exist?
- seertaak 18y ago> In the case of Billy Bragg, it is he who's trying to control Google's content Except that it's not google's content, is it? It's content that's owned by the songwriters, as google themselves acknowledge. Why is this so difficult to understand?