4 ms·
It just sounds like you meant to say "capital is ABUNDANT in comparison to the talent." Capital being scarce in comparison to the talent has been the case for d
by mapgrep 14y ago
It just sounds like you meant to say "capital is ABUNDANT in comparison to the talent." Capital being scarce in comparison to the talent has been the case for decades if not centuries.
>"With convex work in the technological era... your limiting factor, instead, is the time and attention of the highly talented people"
Right, not capital, which is why I thought it odd you said capital was scarce in comparison to talent. I think you meant abundant.
- redblacktree 14y agoI got hung up on the same issue.
- michaelochurch 14y agoGood catch. Thanks!
- mapgrep 14y agoCool, glad I wasn't just dumb or crazy :-) And I look forward to the blog posts.
- michaelochurch 14y agoAbout 20 minutes and I'll kick it out. Had a great productive spell in a cafe. Over 15 kilowords, though. I doubt many people will read it in 1 sitting. :) ETA: http://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/04/03/gervais-macleod-21-why-does-work-suck/ http://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/04/03/gervais-macle...