3 ms·
In that scenario most of the content you are paying for multiple times. Or you can look at it as the redundant content is free and you're paying $7.99/month fo
by MatthewPhillips 14y ago
In that scenario most of the content you are paying for multiple times. Or you can look at it as the redundant content is free and you're paying $7.99/month for House of Cards.
Wouldn't it be better if prices for the content you want were more reasonable? Like, if you could buy a season of House of Cards for $7. And buy an old movie for $0.25?
- mikeryan 14y agoLike, if you could buy a season of House of Cards for $7 I'd like to buy a new porsche for $10k but that's not happening either. Most of Netflix's shows cost over $4M an episode[1]. Taking that as a base you've got a cost of $48M a season (these are production costs not total cost, at $7 a season you need 7M subscribers just to break even ). Considering most shows have less then 4M viewers a night your pricing model pretty much is just throwing money away. 1. http://www.businessinsider.com/netflixs-cost-for-house-of-cards-2013-3 http://www.businessinsider.com/netflixs-cost-for-house-of-ca...
- qualia 14y agoIf it were to be used, how would advertising factor into this? Not saying $7/season is viable but could a low price be buffered out by advertiser sponsorship?