4 ms·
Note that, once again, there is no actual data backing up this assertion. We like to say that github does this and it seems reasonable, but that is not the sam
by pekk 14y ago
Note that, once again, there is no actual data backing up this assertion.
We like to say that github does this and it seems reasonable, but that is not the same as actually showing it to be the case.
Here's the null hypothesis: nobody hires on the basis of the code you put up on github. You will find that hardly anybody even reads that code, even when you give them the link. It is meaningless unless you are already a big name for other reasons.
If you want to maintain that github is a certificate or something, the burden is on you to provide sufficient cause to reject the null hypothesis.
- persianbee27 14y agoThere is no data backing it up but i think it goes without saying that companies that care about the quality of their staff would look at the work of the people they hire. The prospects work would play a major role in the hiring process if it was available. I know for a fact that 37 signals asks for applicants sample project. I completely agree with the writer.