> it clearly is not a fully developed language Says who? Your intuition? > the parallel drawn with French was simply incorrect If you'd actually read that pa

> it clearly is not a fully developed language Says who? Your intuition? > the parallel drawn with French was simply incorrect If you'd actually read that part carefully, you'd notice that the specifics of the example were incorrect, but even the correction is still a valid double-negative in French. > if you're not teaching English effectively As has been repeated several times throughout this thread, the argument was never about changing the English teaching curriculum. It was about having the teachers learn AAVE so they understand their students.