3 ms·
My point is that your argument validly defends Apartheid. It is a standard (if somewhat impolite) rhetorical technique to parrot your opponent's arguments in a
by jibiki 18y ago
My point is that your argument validly defends Apartheid. It is a standard (if somewhat impolite) rhetorical technique to parrot your opponent's arguments in a way that makes them seem obviously flawed.
- sharkbrainguy 18y agoI should probably be downvoted into oblivion for this but... Is this actually a valid use of "Reductio Ad Hitlerum"? Surely such a thing is rare and beautiful.