3 ms·
I'm confused about what we're talking about now. My definition of meritocracy has no moral content either. I'm not saying meritocracy is the same as natural se
by chrischen 14y ago
I'm confused about what we're talking about now. My definition of meritocracy has no moral content either.
I'm not saying meritocracy is the same as natural selection. Meritocracy is the system which aligns itself with natural selection. Merit is assigned by humans, and if assigned perfectly well it should align with natural selection. However, humans are error prone and therefore can never create a completely meritocratic society so meritocracy will never be on the same plane as natural selection.
I guess you can say meritocracy is natural selection emulated by humans. However the universe ultimately forces the selection by merit (perfectly, as whatever the universe chooses is fair) and the humanly chosen merit is gauged by how accurately it aligns with it.
- jacques_chester 14y agoAnd now we're back to circular logic.
- chrischen 14y agoI'm not using meritocracy to define meritocracy. I'm reframing the definition of meritocracy so that saying "creating" meritocracy is a moot concept because meritocracy is not created.