3 ms·
it wasn't intended to be inflammatory. it was intended to display outrage with the situation and how someone can act like that, blatantly.
by jason_slack 14y ago
it wasn't intended to be inflammatory.
it was intended to display outrage with the situation and how someone can act like that, blatantly.
- tiredofcareer 14y ago> it wasn't intended to be inflammatory. Noted. Still was. You can't possibly imagine that calling for mutilating someone isn't inflammatory. Can you? (Your discussion of 'real men' aside, which is a fight I don't feel like having, much like OP!)