So I have looked at the complaints. If you look at the Edit History of the following articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Axon&action=history ht

So I have looked at the complaints. If you look at the Edit History of the following articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Axon&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Axon&action=hi... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insomnia&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insomnia&actio... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Action_potential&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Action_potential&#... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cerebral_hemisphere&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cerebral_hemispher... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corpus_callosum&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corpus_callosum&#3... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neurogenesis&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neurogenesis&a... Basically look for any name in red, which is a high signal for a new editor who hasn't put in much time, and look at the revert edit above it, then click on the "prev" link to see what edit a Wikieditor reverted. Essentially a lot of stuff the students are putting in are probably facts and may be true. However the Professor has essentially failed to teach the students how to put these "facts" in Wikipedia.