> You're trying to have it both ways: you're not willing to stand behind an actual accusation, so instead you hide behind weasel language and only insinuate.

> You're trying to have it both ways: you're not willing to stand behind an actual accusation, so instead you hide behind weasel language and only insinuate. Well, how else do you present negative or inconclusive results? I would say the correct method is to ask a question: "will my startup have to compete with a clone if I seek VC?" That's pretty much what he did. He presented the evidence, and frankly, it's not very strong. That doesn't make it a disingenuous post, just a boring one.