5 ms·
JavaScript provides arrays and objects, and also functions for grouping data (via closures). What else would you expect it to come with? The quality `goog.struc
by oinksoft 14y ago
JavaScript provides arrays and objects, and also functions for grouping data (via closures). What else would you expect it to come with? The quality `goog.structs` package speaks to how easy it is to create very high-level data structures.
Are you perhaps thinking of the baroque and once-very-inconsistently-implemented DOM API?
Regarding your other points, JS is an extremely object-oriented language. I really don't think you need more "working with obejcts" things out-of-the-box. Iteration is very straightforward in all cases, unless you find hasOwnProperty confusing. The Node.js project has demonstrated well how easily Async maps to JS outside of the browser model (where Async has always reigned).
JS is a strange beast in certain ways, but it is a featureful language.
- mythz 14y agoJavaScript is extremely poor at expressing OOP, it requires so much un-intuitive boilerplate to express your intent that many don't bother and will just hack together the simplest thing that works. Which causes the current situation of having so many different libraries to declare classes and they all do it their own unique way which are not compatible with each other. It's the same for iteration, the hasOwnProperty is mostly omitted because it works most of the time without it and specifying it adds un-necessary boiler plate. Same with async, there's a zillion async libraries that try to manage async in different ways and they aren't interchangable either. By standardizing on Futures/Streams it means all libraries can build on consistent and composable foundations and build higher-level functionality.
- tjholowaychuk 14y agoIf you avoid inheritance js is just fine, inheritance is a pretty terrible concept to begin with IMO.