4 ms·
In software, optimizing this type of garbage collection for low pauses usually results in reduced application throughput. Evolution in general clearly does no
by davidbnewquist 18y ago
In software, optimizing this type of garbage collection for low pauses usually results in reduced application throughput. Evolution in general clearly does not favor "low pause" sleep patterns.
However, there are anecdotes of rare people that subsist on "low pause" sleeping. Allegedly, Thomas Edison had a 24 word day and frequently cat-napped. Contrast that with Einstein who allegedly slept 10 hrs a night.
For modern garbage collection systems (e.g. the JVM), there is no single setting that is best (or even acceptable) for all applications. The same is probably true for sleep patterns.
- amichail 18y agoEvolution in general clearly does not favor "low pause" sleep patterns. Evolution does not consider every possibility. And when it does consider one, it doesn't necessary "implement" it well.
- davidbnewquist 18y agoWell, if the genes regulating sleep patterns are half as tedious as the gc params for the 1.4.2 JVM, I wouldn't want to consider every possibility either:P