3 ms·
I'm responding to you as an example of a certain line of thought that limits on copying are somehow infringing on your "right" to do as you wish with copyable c
by b1daly 14y ago
I'm responding to you as an example of a certain line of thought that limits on copying are somehow infringing on your "right" to do as you wish with copyable content.
Where does this right come from? People have some intuition about stealing physical things, but many areas of law involve intangible entities. In your example of suing an employee for releasing source code in violation of an agreement, you are using law to effect an outcome that is every bit as abstracted as copyright law.
There is also an aspect of arbitrariness to most law that can be annoying but it serves a function.
- csallen 14y agoI generally agree with Jefferson's ideas about the freedom of information and ideas: http://movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/06/thomas-jefferson-on-patents-and-freedom-of-ideas/ http://movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/06/thomas-jefferson-on-pa... I don't think that a law is unjust simply because it deals with intangibles. I simply think that copyright/patent law lend themselves easily to abuse.