4 ms·

I'm sorry you feel that way; that wasn't our intent. If you've got ideas about how we might improve it, please let us know: https://www.djangoproject.com/conduc

• tiredofcareer 14y ago
  No, no, Jacob, not you -- you guys do great work! Relax! I was replying to parfe's characterization of those who do disagree.
• deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
• jerrya 14y ago
  I know little about Django. Have you really had a problem with the behavior of your participants that requires this formal code of conduct as a solution? Your code of conduct on its face seems innocuous, but there seems to be an elephant that you are trying not to discuss. As illustrated by great-grandparent, there seem to be many eager to take your code of conduct and wielding it like a shield use it to bludgeon others with behavior contrary to your intentions. Excellently written answer to deal with the torrent of complaints spewed by man-children at the requirement they be considerate of others. "My free speeches!" and "How dare you censor me?" and "But what about my get-back-in-the-kitchen and make-me-a-sandwich jokes?! You've killed comedy!" If I had a suggestion, it would be to take from the Wikipedia and assume good faith which is a principle that your Speak Up! source also dances around, in that it seems a person can "assume bad faith" and still comply with each principle in your code of conduct. Don't be a dick. Do unto others.... Assume good faith. Each of these seem to concisely cover the issues you have without leading to their abuse, or tyranny of the (majority, minority).
  • deleted 14y ago
    [deleted]