2 ms·
If you do not see that your third paragraph contradicts your first then I cannot help you. Jobs was involved in numerous projects creating highly popular techn
by talmand 14y ago
If you do not see that your third paragraph contradicts your first then I cannot help you.
Jobs was involved in numerous projects creating highly popular technical products in several different roles. Now did he dig in to create the circuit boards and code the programs himself? No, he did not. But that's like saying a team lead is not a technical person because he doesn't code himself. To help create technical products from the ground up there has to be some level technical knowledge involved. Maybe your standard of what constitutes technical knowledge is higher than mine or maybe we just think of being technical as different things.
As I said before, your third paragraph agrees with my point. What you are complaining about has been around for quite a while and will most likely will exist for a time to come.
Someone with no technical knowledge asking for help on a project and not getting it does not necessarily lead to your conclusion on the community in general. One could say the same if you have a crazy idea for a new type of house, when you've never built a house before, and no one in the construction industry steps forward to build your house on spec for no money down. That's simply how the world works and has always worked. What you want is the exception to be the rule.
But then again, I'm sure the open source world has several examples of what you say doesn't happen.
- Cardeck1 14y agoI don't see the contradiction but my point is, if we want to see more steves we should improve the relationship between us and them even if we have the hard part of the startup.Which is almost always the case. But hey, if you choose to be a programmer, you should do it because you really like it not because you make a lot of money. I can work 30h non stop on a project I like even if it's not mine, because I really like to build projects. I don't want the exception to be the rule.It would be impossible after all.What I want is tech guys to risk more when it comes to non-technical people. Btw, when you are smart and very talented you don't really need to get that technical.I already wrote about a non-technical guy I've worked with which had no technical background and no experience with startups that was able to build a product from his mind. I was shocked.I mean he didn't even know how to design it in photoshop.He was able to guide us through the building process almost perfectly.Now, of course he was reading a lot about everything but besides that he had no real technical background. Should I say that guy was technical or non-technical?We probably see things differently. We should return to our topic subject because we are entering the eternal debate and we will just ruin the topic.
- talmand 14y agoI agree since you keep contradicting yourself.