4 ms·
> It seems that if you want to make a probability based game you ought to have at least a working knowledge of the basics. People have been making games of cha
by sequoia 14y ago
> It seems that if you want to make a probability based game you ought to have at least a working knowledge of the basics.
People have been making games of chance since long before advanced mathematics. Being a statistician doesn't necessarily mean you can design a great game - the opposite holds as well.
- DividesByZero 14y agoThat's true, but I'm sure it would have helped while the author was trying to balance the game out to better understand the sources of particular imbalances, rather than having to guess-and-iterate on them.
- padraigm 14y agoThe guess-and-iterate method would still be more efficient than trying to work through a stats textbook if the author is not educated in mathematics, though. Anyway, a lot of people don't enjoy learning math (crazy as that concept may seem to me, and, I guess, you) but guessing-and-iterating on a game you're excited about would always be fun.
- DividesByZero 14y agoVery fair. I guess more maths isn't always better after all.