I actually thought that the article made a couple of interesting points (e.g. the dangers of monopolies), but then undermined them completely by launching into

I actually thought that the article made a couple of interesting points (e.g. the dangers of monopolies), but then undermined them completely by launching into a biased and almost hysterical rant (e.g. associating the problems caused by newspapers losing readership and Google, even when admitting in the article that Google can't be blamed for that.) Shame.