3 ms·

> seems like it'd convert really well. Yeah, I'm looking at a similar 'mothballware' plan (for want of a better term) at a similar price point for something I

> seems like it'd convert really well. Yeah, I'm looking at a similar 'mothballware' plan (for want of a better term) at a similar price point for something I'm currently building. I'd be interested to hear of others' experience of it. Yes, there's a risk of it seeming like you're cutting off something people are using, but if they're that invested in it, hopefully they won't mind chipping in a modest amount now they know they really do like it. EDIT: apologies for this being a pretty vapid comment - curled up on sofa, ill.

bpatrianakos 14y ago
No apology necessary, I'm at work, ill. Bronchitis. Totally understand. I don't know what you mean by mothballware. Care to elaborate? I don't think there's a risk of seeming like you're cutting people off. So long as you're up-front with people when they sign up then there's no problem with this. The value is in the ability to add and edit your bookmarks. Being able to access them later is trivial if you're looking at it from Tinmark's perspective and from a user's perspective this is the same as getting a try-before-you-buy premium account.
- stevejalim 14y ago
  > I don't know what you mean by mothballware. Care to elaborate? On reflection, it's a pretty lame term I tried to coin there. I was looking for something that expressed the idea that after a certain period of time, accounts that weren't dormant would need paying for before in order to be used properly again, so a bit like them being mothballed (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=define%3A%20mothballed https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=define%3A%20mothballed) and unmothballed when eventually paid for. Like I said, lame term. Am sure there's a better word out there that'll come to me when my head is clear.
ruswick 14y ago
I generally avoid services that operate under this model. I don't appreciate my experience being limited after some arbitrary amount of time. I vastly prefer freemium-based business models, where I know that I will have indefinite access to a limited subset of a product's features, versus becoming acquainted to the full version before being cut off in an attempt to coerce a purchase out of me.

bpatrianakos 14y ago

No apology necessary, I'm at work, ill. Bronchitis. Totally understand. I don't know what you mean by mothballware. Care to elaborate? I don't think there's a risk of seeming like you're cutting people off. So long as you're up-front with people when they sign up then there's no problem with this. The value is in the ability to add and edit your bookmarks. Being able to access them later is trivial if you're looking at it from Tinmark's perspective and from a user's perspective this is the same as getting a try-before-you-buy premium account.

stevejalim 14y ago
> I don't know what you mean by mothballware. Care to elaborate? On reflection, it's a pretty lame term I tried to coin there. I was looking for something that expressed the idea that after a certain period of time, accounts that weren't dormant would need paying for before in order to be used properly again, so a bit like them being mothballed (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=define%3A%20mothballed https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=define%3A%20mothballed) and unmothballed when eventually paid for. Like I said, lame term. Am sure there's a better word out there that'll come to me when my head is clear.

ruswick 14y ago

I generally avoid services that operate under this model. I don't appreciate my experience being limited after some arbitrary amount of time. I vastly prefer freemium-based business models, where I know that I will have indefinite access to a limited subset of a product's features, versus becoming acquainted to the full version before being cut off in an attempt to coerce a purchase out of me.