5 ms·
Agreed. Most of the "points" were either personal taste, or jQuery won but it was called a tie because of "negligible difference" (for example - the fact that j
by intranation 18y ago
Agreed. Most of the "points" were either personal taste, or jQuery won but it was called a tie because of "negligible difference" (for example - the fact that jQuery core is 30% smaller than ExtJS, but it's "only 19Kb").
Or ExtJS's ostensibly "more powerful DOM manipulators", which actually fail to be demonstrated in the article.
Very poor article.
- TimSporcic 18y agoSo sorry for having a personal opinion on my personal blog :-) 19K has never mattered to me compared to all the rest of the stuff that ends up getting pulled down. Since both are base libraries, I have always ended up including more. I explicitly kept this comparison to their overlap. I'll be doing another post covering the areas where Ext Core excels. Both libraries are very good and you can't go wrong with either, but I do prefer Ext Core.