3 ms·

I bothered to find this for you, not that I expect you to be grateful -- you probably think that attacking your conspiracy theories is the same as attacking you

• acqq 14y ago
  These two spies are irrelevant to Tony Blair's clerks who were so desperate to actually take a student's thesis (!) as a constructed "proof" for the Irag's WMD, it's documented since 2003: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodgy_dossier http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodgy_dossier
  • berntb 14y ago
    From the wikipedia page you referenced, that was something given to journalists: >> issued to journalists on 3 February 2003 by Alastair Campbell, Blair's Director of Communications and Strategy In short, a PR release had bad quality control. Wow, that must be the first time in world history... You have gone from: Claiming propaganda offices get their world view out in media without criticism. To: Pointing to low quality propaganda from governments, which is laughed at. You're arguing against your original position. Film at 11. (I might also note, re the original point, that you didn't answer when it is pointed out that lots of sources in other western countries say the same thing about Chinese spying.) And so on. (I don't know if you have a point, is trolling, you're writing from China -- or what the hell this is. It isn't interesting, so never mind.)